JMERC
Owner
Janbazan Medical and Engineering Research Center (JMERC) is the owner of IJWPH.
0.3
Cite Score
SJR: 0.114 / SNIP: 0.090
Volume 14, Issue 1 (2022)
Iran J War Public Health 2022, 14(1): 9-17 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2022/01/2 | Accepted: 2022/02/23 | Published: 2022/04/24
Received: 2022/01/2 | Accepted: 2022/02/23 | Published: 2022/04/24
How to cite this article
Kaliuzhna Y, Savchenko N, Zinchenko I, Kaizerova A, Martyniuk I. Psychological Features of the Formation of Corporeality in Young Women. Iran J War Public Health 2022; 14 (1) :9-17
URL: http://ijwph.ir/article-1-1109-en.html
URL: http://ijwph.ir/article-1-1109-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Psychology, Institute of Personnel Training of the State Employment Service of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine
Abstract (1081 Views)
Aim: The aim of the study was to reveal the essence and structure of the program for the development of female corporeality, identify psychological features of work in the context of individual consultations, describe the content of group classes, and analyze empirical data obtained as a result of the program implementation.
Instrument & Methods: This descriptive study was conducted in 2020-2021 in Kyiv, Ukraine on 151 women who agreed to pass the survey and the author's program. The study took place in Institute of Personnel Training of the State Employment Service of Ukraine. They were selected by convenience sampling method. Young women under the age of 40, without clinical psychiatric disorders, were selected for the study. The program "Psychological features of the development of female corporeality" consists of individual consultations and group classes. The results of the tests were calculated as mean±SD. The threshold of reliability of the obtained data was designated as p<0.05.
Findings: Such psychological features of corporeality in young women in the context of phenomenology are determined: indicators of psychosomatic potential, the competence of verbalization of bodily self and locus of body control, types of self-awareness, and self-reflection of bodily potential. The results of the study showed that the conformist type of self-reflection of bodily potential prevails among women and it can be affirmed that women aged 20 to 35 years are characterized by an insufficient level of self-reflection of bodily potential.
Conclusion: The content of the program on body development in young women is revealed.
Instrument & Methods: This descriptive study was conducted in 2020-2021 in Kyiv, Ukraine on 151 women who agreed to pass the survey and the author's program. The study took place in Institute of Personnel Training of the State Employment Service of Ukraine. They were selected by convenience sampling method. Young women under the age of 40, without clinical psychiatric disorders, were selected for the study. The program "Psychological features of the development of female corporeality" consists of individual consultations and group classes. The results of the tests were calculated as mean±SD. The threshold of reliability of the obtained data was designated as p<0.05.
Findings: Such psychological features of corporeality in young women in the context of phenomenology are determined: indicators of psychosomatic potential, the competence of verbalization of bodily self and locus of body control, types of self-awareness, and self-reflection of bodily potential. The results of the study showed that the conformist type of self-reflection of bodily potential prevails among women and it can be affirmed that women aged 20 to 35 years are characterized by an insufficient level of self-reflection of bodily potential.
Conclusion: The content of the program on body development in young women is revealed.
Keywords:
References
1. Deutsch H. Psychoanalysis of the sexual functions of women. Moscow: T8 Publishing Technology; 2017. [Russian] [Link] [DOI:10.4324/9780429482878]
2. Kalyuzhna E, Savchenko N. A research of psychological peculiarities of the corporeality of young women in the context of phenomenology. Psychol J. 2021;7(5):75-84. [Link] [DOI:10.31108/1.2021.7.5.7]
3. Moroz LI, Safin AD, Andrusik OO. Influence of emotions on the effectiveness of the creative process. Sci Bull Mukachevo State Univ Ser Pedag Psychol. 2021;7(3):87-93. [Link] [DOI:10.52534/msu-pp.7(3).2021.87-93]
4. Mahdysiuk LI, Demchuk VB, Pavlova BV. Modern approaches to the prevention of deviant behavior in the activities of psychological services. Sci Bull Mukachevo State Univ.Ser Pedag Psychol. 2021;7(1):9-17. [Link] [DOI:10.52534/msu-pp.7(1).2021.9-17]
5. Kocharyan OS, Smakhtina NO. Psychological features of the types of female sexuality. Bull Mykolaiv State Univ V.O. Sukhomlinsky. 2010;2(4):120-5. [Ukrainian] [Link]
6. Winnicott DV. Small children and their mothers. Moscow: Class; 1998. [Russian] [Link]
7. Bonaparte M. Women's sexuality. St. Petersburg: Cultural Initiative; 2010. [Russian] [Link]
8. Freud Z. Three essays on the theory of sexuality. Moscow: Kogito-Center; 1905. [Link]
9. Lacan J. The Ego in Freud's theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis. Moscow: Logos; 1999. [Russian] [Link]
10. Dolto F. Unconscious body image. Moscow: ERGO; 2006. [Russian] [Link]
11. Maksimenko SD, Prokofev O, Tsarkova O, Kochkurova O. Workshop on group psycho-correction. Melitopol: Center Lux; 2015. [Ukrainian] [Link]
12. Kornienko ІO. This is self-presentation as a determinant of becoming a coping-strategy specialty. Bull Odessa Nat Univ. 2013;4(30):168-79. [Ukrainian] [Link]
13. Mazin VA. Introduction to Lacan. Moscow: Foundation for Scientific Research Pragmatics of Culture; 2004. [Russian] [Link]
14. Olifirovich NI, Zinkevich-Kuzemkina TA, Velenta TF. Psychology of family crises. Saint Petersburg: Rech; 2006. [Russian] [Link]
15. Savchenko NV. The formation of corporality in young women in the process of developing the relationships with parents. Probl Mod Psychol. 2020;1(17):170-5. [Ukrainian] [Link] [DOI:10.26661/2310-4368/2020-1-20]
16. Skugarevsky OA, Frolova YuG. Social factors in the formation of a negative body image. Sociol. 2004;2:61-8. [Russian] [Link]
17. Koshevoy V, Naumenko S, Skliarov P, Fedorenko S, Kostyshyn L. Male infertility: Pathogenetic significance of oxidative stress and antioxidant defence (review). Sci Horiz. 2021;24(6):107-16. [Link] [DOI:10.48077/scihor.24(6).2021.107-116]
18. Klein M. Psychoanalytic works: development of one child. Izhevsk: Publishing House ERGO; 2007. [Russian] [Link]
19. Pujiyono, Ahmad SD, Budiyanti RT. Sex selection using assisted reproductive technology: An Islamic law perspective. Med Law 2017;36(4):45-52. [Link]
20. Manikowski R, García I. Inadequate diagnosis processes in cases of suspicion of sexual abuse and abuse in children: Ethical aspects in health care. Med Law 2020;39(1):63-8. [Link]
21. Prus I. Legal principles to combat gender-based violence. Law J Nat Acad Intern Aff. 2021;11(1):74-80. [Ukrainian] [Link] [DOI:10.33270/04212101.74]
22. Slovska I. Does gender equality sound like a Utopia?. Sci J Nat Acad Intern Aff. 2021;119(2):107-12. [Ukrainian] [Link] [DOI:10.33270/01211192.107]
23. Watanabe Y, Miyazaki M. Sex-related violence and the protection of women's health in Japan. Med Law. 2018;37(2):353-62. [Link]
24. Sharff D. Sexual relations. Moscow: Kogito-Center; 2008. [Russian] [Link]
25. Pahomov VV, Karikh IV, Bondarenko MO. Grooming as a modern form of sexual violence. Leg Horiz. 2021;14(2):77-82. [Ukrainian] [Link]