[Home ] [Archive]    
:: Current Issue :: Search :: Submit an Article ::
:: Volume 14, Issue 1 (2022) ::
Iran J War Public Health 2022, 14(1): 51-57 Back to browse issues page
Comparative Evaluation of LMA-Supreme and i-gel Supraglottic Airway Devices with Endotracheal Intubation during Surgical Correction of Traumatic Orbital Injuries
I. Kostetskiy *1, V. Bagin2, A. Kaliskin3, A. Shamrikov3, N. Davydova4
1- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care No. 1, City Clinical Hospital No. 23, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation , kostetskiy8363-1@murdoch.in
2- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care No. 5, City Clinical Hospital No. 40, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
3- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care No. 1, City Clinical Hospital No. 23, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
4- Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Abstract:   (269 Views)
Aims: The study aimed to compare endotracheal intubation with i-gel and LMA (laryngeal mask airway) supreme supraglottic airway devices in orbital osteosynthesis surgery.
Materials & Methods: This comparative perspective single-center randomized study was conducted in Yekaterinburg Clinical Hospitals, Russia, in 2021. The number of 134 patients undergoing orbital plasty after fracture were enrolled in the study and were randomized into three groups: 43 in the endotracheal intubation group, 42 in the LMA-Supreme group, and 49 patients were included in the i-gel group. Hemodynamic parameters, respiratory mechanics, respiration, oropharyngeal leak pressure at different stages of surgical intervention, as well as the time of airway device insertion, the number of attempts, and the need for additional maneuvers to insert the airway device were assessed. For statistical processing, the EZR 1.37 on R commander 3.4.1 was used with the Kruskal-Wallis h-criterion and Pearson’s χ²-test.
Findings: In the postoperative period, the assessment of complications associated with the insertion of airway devices was implemented. We did not receive clinically significant differences in mechanical ventilation parameters between groups at the study stages (p>0.05). A reliable difference in oropharyngeal leak pressure at the beginning and the end of the surgical intervention was obtained (p<0.05). The number of complications was minimal and did not differ between the groups (p>0.05).
Conclusion: LMA-S and i-gel supraglottic airway devices allow to provide normal lung ventilation and gas exchange and can be an alternative to endotracheal intubation during orbital osteosynthesis surgery.
Keywords: |Supraglottitis|Airway Management|Laryngeal Masks ,
Full-Text [PDF 540 kb]   (228 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: War/Accident Related Injuries and its Complications
Received: 2022/01/1 | Accepted: 2022/02/23 | Published: 2022/01/20
* Corresponding Author Address: 620017, 9 Starykh Bolshevikov Str., Yekaterinburg, Russian Federation
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML     Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kostetskiy I, Bagin V, Kaliskin A, Shamrikov A, Davydova N. Comparative Evaluation of LMA-Supreme and i-gel Supraglottic Airway Devices with Endotracheal Intubation during Surgical Correction of Traumatic Orbital Injuries. Iran J War Public Health. 2022; 14 (1) :51-57
URL: http://ijwph.ir/article-1-1112-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 14, Issue 1 (2022) Back to browse issues page
مجله طب جانباز Iranian Journal of War and Public Health
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 31 queries by YEKTAWEB 4410