JMERC
Owner
Janbazan Medical and Engineering Research Center (JMERC) is the owner of IJWPH.
0.3
Cite Score
SJR: 0.114 / SNIP: 0.090
Volume 13, Issue 4 (2021)
Iran J War Public Health 2021, 13(4): 239-245 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2021/08/14 | Accepted: 2021/09/4 | Published: 2022/01/24
Received: 2021/08/14 | Accepted: 2021/09/4 | Published: 2022/01/24
How to cite this article
Abdulabbass Shamkhi I, Muzhir Gabash K. Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Closure versus Non-Closure of the Fascial Sheath Opening of the Sub-Umbilical Port Site "10mm.". Iran J War Public Health 2021; 13 (4) :239-245
URL: http://ijwph.ir/article-1-1019-en.html
URL: http://ijwph.ir/article-1-1019-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Authors
I. Abdulabbass Shamkhi *1, Kh. Muzhir Gabash1
1- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Wasit University, Kut, Iraq
Abstract (1423 Views)
Aims: Rate of complications such as obstructed port site hernia is low depending on size and site of the port incision, type of used trocar, patient's condition, and surgeon's experience. This study was aimed to compare closure versus non-closure of the fascial sheath opening of the sub-umbilical port site "10mm".
Materials & Methods: This prospective study was performed on 50 patients in AL-Karama Teaching Hospital from September 2017 to January 2018. They were alternatively divided to Group A: sub-umbilical port site fascial defect of 10mm in diameter was closed with Zero Nylon in addition to skin closure with Zero Silk, and Group B: sub-umbilical port site fascial defect of 10mm in diameter was left without closure, only skin was closed with Zero Silk. A sharp trocar 10mm was introduced through the linea alba into the abdominal cavity at the sub-umbilical site for laparoscopic access.
Findings: The two groups had incidence rates of port site hernia, infection, and bleeding of zero, and there was no complication (hernia, bleeding, and infection) related to sub-umbilical port sites in both groups during 4-16 weeks follow-up.
Conclusion: The closure of the laparoscopic port fascial defects is time-consuming; using suture material increases the procedure's financial cost. It is not free of complications such as inadvertent omentum or bowel loop injury.
Materials & Methods: This prospective study was performed on 50 patients in AL-Karama Teaching Hospital from September 2017 to January 2018. They were alternatively divided to Group A: sub-umbilical port site fascial defect of 10mm in diameter was closed with Zero Nylon in addition to skin closure with Zero Silk, and Group B: sub-umbilical port site fascial defect of 10mm in diameter was left without closure, only skin was closed with Zero Silk. A sharp trocar 10mm was introduced through the linea alba into the abdominal cavity at the sub-umbilical site for laparoscopic access.
Findings: The two groups had incidence rates of port site hernia, infection, and bleeding of zero, and there was no complication (hernia, bleeding, and infection) related to sub-umbilical port sites in both groups during 4-16 weeks follow-up.
Conclusion: The closure of the laparoscopic port fascial defects is time-consuming; using suture material increases the procedure's financial cost. It is not free of complications such as inadvertent omentum or bowel loop injury.
Keywords:
References
1. Mahajan N, Gaikwad N. Direct trocar insertion: A safe laparoscopic access. Internet J Gynecol Obstet. 2007;8(2):1-4. [Link] [DOI:10.5580/1a]
2. Anaise D. Vascular and bowel injuries during laparoscopy [Internet]. Veteran Disability and Long Term Disability Lawyer; 2014 [Cited 2018 Aug 22]. Available from: https://www.danaise.com/vascular-and-bowel-injuries-during-laparoscopy/ [Link]
3. Vilos GA, Ternamian A, Dempter J, Laberge PY. Laparoscopic entry: A review of techniques, technologies, and complications. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2007;29(5):433-47. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S1701-2163(16)35497-4]
4. Strasberg SM. Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: Part 1. Processes used in the determination of standard of care in misidentification injuries. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(4):598-603. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.05.009] [PMID]
5. Strasberg SM. Biliary injury in laparoscopic surgery: Part 2. Changing the culture of cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201(4):604-11. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.04.032] [PMID]
6. Khan MH, Howard TJ, Fogel EL, Sherman S, McHenry L, Watkins JL, et al. frequency of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy detected by ERCP: Experience at a large tertiary referral center. Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;65(2):247-52. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2005.12.037] [PMID]
7. Pazouki A, Abdollahi A, Mehrabi Bahr M, Jangjoo A, Pezeshki Rad M, Aliakbarian M, et al. Evaluation of the incidence of complications of lost gallstones during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2014;24(3):213-5. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/SLE.0b013e31828fc09e] [PMID]
8. Binenbaum SJ, Goldfarb MA. Inadvertent enterotomy in minimally invasive abdominal surgery. JSLS. 2006;10(3):336-40. [Link]
9. Jansen FW, Kolkman W, Bakkum EA, De Kroon CD, Trimbos-Kemper TC, Trimbos JB. Complications of laparoscopy: An inquiry about closed- versus open-entry technique. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(3):634-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2003.09.035] [PMID]
10. Bunting DM. Port-site hernia following laparoscopic cholecystectomy. JSLS. 2010;14(4):490-7. [Link] [DOI:10.4293/108680810X12924466007728] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Comajuncosas J, Vallverdú H, Orbeal R. Trocar site incisional hernia in laparoscopic surgery. Cir Esp. 2011;89(2):72-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S2173-5077(11)70010-2]
12. Wind J, Cremers JEL, Van Berge Henegouwen MI, Gouma DJ, Jansen FW, Bemelman W. Medical liability insurance claims on entry-related complications in laparoscopy. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(11):2094-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00464-007-9315-8] [PMID]
13. Zacks SL, Sandler RS, Rutledge R, Brown RS. A population-based cohort study comparing laparoscopic cholecystectomy and open cholecystectomy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;97(2):334-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05466.x] [PMID]
14. Molloy D, Kaloo PD, Cooper M, Nguyen TV. Laparoscopic entry: A literature review and analysis of techniques and complications of primary port entry. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;42(3):246-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.0004-8666.2002.00246.x] [PMID]
15. Hamzaoglu I, Baca B, Böler DE, Polat E, Ozer Y. Is umbilical flora responsible for wound infection after laparoscopic surgery? Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14(5):263-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/00129689-200410000-00007] [PMID]
16. Lilani SP, Jangale N, Chowdhary A, Daver GB. Surgical site infection in clean and clean-contaminated cases. Indian J Med Microbiol. 2005;23(4):249-52. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0255-0857(21)02530-5]
17. Francis NK, Mason J, Salib E, Allanby L, Messenger D, Allison AS, et al. Factors predicting 30-day readmission after laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery within an enhanced recovery programme. Colorectal Dis. 2015;17(7):O148-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/codi.13002] [PMID]
18. Brill A, Ghosh K, Gunnarsson C, Rizzo J, Fullum T, Maxey C, et al. The effects of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, and appendectomy on nosocomial infection risks. Surg Endosc. 2008;22(4):1112-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s00464-008-9815-1] [PMID] [PMCID]
19. Richards C, Edwards J, Culver D, Emori TG, Tolson J, Gaynes R, et al. Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg. 2003;237(3):358-62.
https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-200303000-00009 [Link] [DOI:10.1097/01.SLA.0000055221.50062.7A]
20. Lee P, Lai Psh, Yang ChY, Chen ChN, Lai IR, Lin MT. A gasless laparoscopic technique of wide excision for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor versus open method. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:44. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/1477-7819-11-44] [PMID] [PMCID]
21. Karthik S, Augustine AJ, Shibumon MM, Varadaraya Pai M. Analysis of laparoscopic port site complications: A descriptive study. J Minim Access Surg. 2013;9(2);59-64. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/0972-9941.110964] [PMID] [PMCID]
22. Chiu CC, Lee WJ, Wang W, Wei PL, Huang MT. Prevention of trocar-wound hernia in laparoscopic bariatric operations. Obes Surg. 2006;16(7):913-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1381/096089206777822269] [PMID]
23. Mudgal MM, Kothiya PK, Kushwah N, Singh R. Port site complications following laparoscopic surgeries: A prospective study. Int Surg J. 2018;5(2):598-601. [Link] [DOI:10.18203/2349-2902.isj20180360]
24. Krishnakumar S, Tambe P. Entry complications in laparoscopic surgery. J Gynecol Endosc Surg. 2009;1(1):4-11. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/0974-1216.51902] [PMID] [PMCID]
25. Sturm R. Increases in morbid obesity in the USA: 2000-2005. Public Health. 2007;121 (7):492-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.puhe.2007.01.006] [PMID] [PMCID]
26. Hussain A, Mahmood H, Singhal T, Balakrishnan S, Nicholls J, El-Hasani S. Long-term study of port-site incisional hernia after laparoscopic procedures. JSLS. 2009;13(3):346-9. [Link]
27. Jamil M, Falah SQ, Marwat AA, Soomro MI. Port site hernia: A complication of minimal access surgery. Gomal J Med Sci. 2016;14(2):92-4. [Link]
28. Aziz HH. A Simple technique of laparoscopic port closure. JSLS. 2013;17(4):672-4. [Link] [DOI:10.4293/108680813X13794522666482] [PMID] [PMCID]
29. Yi F, Jin WS, Xiang DB, Sun GY, Huaguo D. Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its prevention: A review and experience of 400 cases. Hepatogastroenterology. 2012;59(113):47-50. [Link]
30. Soroush A, Khorgami Z, Jahangiri Y, Mofid R, Nasiri Sh, Aminian A, et al. Assessing effect of fascial non-closure in 10 mm trocar sites on incidence of incisional hernia. Ann Bariatr Surg. 2013;2(1):99-102. [Link] [DOI:10.5812/jmiss.6565]
31. Singal R, Zaman M, Mittal A, Singal S, Sandhu K, Mittal A. No need of fascia closure to reduce trocar site hernia rate in laparoscopic surgery: A prospective study of 200 non-obese patients. Gastroenterology Res. 2016;9(4-5):70-3. [Link] [DOI:10.14740/gr715w] [PMID] [PMCID]
32. Al-Dhahiry JK, Melek HK, Abduljabbar TK. Laparoscopic surgery: Is it essential to close the trocar site fascial defects of 5 and 10 millimeters in diameter. JMSCR. 2017;5(2):17420-42. [Link] [DOI:10.18535/jmscr/v5i2.34]
33. Vagenas K, Karamanakos SN, Spyropoulos C, Panagiotopoulos S, Karanikolas M, Stavropoulos M. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A report from a single center. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12(24):3887-90. [Link] [DOI:10.3748/wjg.v12.i24.3887] [PMID] [PMCID]
34. Marakis GN, Pavlidis TE, Aimoniotou E, Psarras K, Karvounaris D, Rafailidis S, et al. Major complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Int Surg. 2007;92(3):142-6. [Link]
35. Tuveri M, Tuveri A. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Complications and conversions with the 3-trocar technique: A 10-year Review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007;17(5):380-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1097/SLE.0b013e3180dca5d6] [PMID]
36. Khan MW, Aziz MM. Experience in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Mymensingh Med J. 2010;19(1):77-84. [Link]
37. Taj MN, Iqbal Y, Akbar Z. Frequency and prevention of laparoscopic port site infection. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2012;24(3-4):197-9. [Link]
38. Mir MA, Malik UY, Wani H, Bali BS. Prevalence, pattern, sensitivity and resistance to antibiotics of different bacteria isolated from port site infection in low risk patients after elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptomatic cholelithiasis at tertiary care hospital of Kashmir. Int Wound J. 2013;10(1):110-3. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2012.00963.x] [PMID] [PMCID]
39. Yanni F, Mekhail P, Morris-Stiff G. A selective antibiotic prophylaxis policy for laparoscopic cholecystectomy is effective in minimising infective complications. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2013;95(5):345-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1308/003588413X13629960045959] [PMID] [PMCID]