JMERC
Owner
Janbazan Medical and Engineering Research Center (JMERC) is the owner of IJWPH.
0.4
Cite Score
SJR: 0.114 / SNIP: 0.090
Volume 14, Issue 4 (2022)
Iran J War Public Health 2022, 14(4): 391-400 |
Back to browse issues page
Article Type:
Subject:
History
Received: 2022/04/19 | Accepted: 2022/07/25 | Published: 2022/11/1
Received: 2022/04/19 | Accepted: 2022/07/25 | Published: 2022/11/1
How to cite this article
Noferesti A, Behfar Z, Salehi K. Perception of Subjective Well-being in an Iranian Urban Population: A Phenomenological Study. Iran J War Public Health 2022; 14 (4) :391-400
URL: http://ijwph.ir/article-1-1150-en.html
URL: http://ijwph.ir/article-1-1150-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
1- Department of Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Shahid Hashemi Nezhad Pardis, University of Farhangian, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Curriculum Development & Instruction Methods, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Shahid Hashemi Nezhad Pardis, University of Farhangian, Mashhad, Iran
3- Department of Curriculum Development & Instruction Methods, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (1208 Views)
Aims: Based on cross-cultural studies, the experience of subjective well-being may be different in distinct populations. The findings of recent studies do not provide empirical evidence on subjective well-being in Iran. This study aimed to identify the most important components of subjective well-being in an urban Iranian population using a qualitative method with a phenomenological approach.
Participants & Methods: Sixty Iranian men and women aged 18 to 65 with different economic, social, and educational backgrounds voluntarily participated in semi-structured interviews, which focused on their experience of subjective well-being. The participants were selected based on purposeful sampling, and the data analysis was performed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method.
Findings: The analysis revealed several main themes about subjective well-being from the studied sample as follows: fulfillment of basic needs and welfare, positive relationships with family and community, having positive emotion, and orientation about persistency, contentment, and spirituality. Although these themes are usually stated in subjective well-being research, the expression of these themes and subthemes was unique in the Iranian culture.
Conclusion: The findings of this study enhance the current subjective well-being literature and understanding of this experience in the Iranian culture and contribute to the limited knowledge about well-being in this nation with its unique culture.
Participants & Methods: Sixty Iranian men and women aged 18 to 65 with different economic, social, and educational backgrounds voluntarily participated in semi-structured interviews, which focused on their experience of subjective well-being. The participants were selected based on purposeful sampling, and the data analysis was performed using Colaizzi's phenomenological method.
Findings: The analysis revealed several main themes about subjective well-being from the studied sample as follows: fulfillment of basic needs and welfare, positive relationships with family and community, having positive emotion, and orientation about persistency, contentment, and spirituality. Although these themes are usually stated in subjective well-being research, the expression of these themes and subthemes was unique in the Iranian culture.
Conclusion: The findings of this study enhance the current subjective well-being literature and understanding of this experience in the Iranian culture and contribute to the limited knowledge about well-being in this nation with its unique culture.
Keywords:
References
1. Diener E, Wirtz D, Tov W, Kim-Prieto C, Choi DW, Oishi S, Biswas-Diener R. New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Soc Indic Res. 2010;97(2):143-56. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s11205-009-9493-y]
2. Diener E, Lucas RE, Oishi S, Hall N, Donnellan MB. Advances and open questions in the science of subjective well-being. Collabra Psychol. 2018;4(1):15. [Link] [DOI:10.1525/collabra.115]
3. Helliwell JF, Huang H, Wang S. The distribution of world happiness [Internet]. New York: World Happiness; 2016 [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2016/. [Link]
4. Steptoe A, Wardle J. Positive affect measured using ecological momentary assessment and survival in older men and women. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2011;108(45):18244-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1073/pnas.1110892108]
5. Diener E, Chan MY. Happy people live longer: Subjective well‐being contributes to health and longevity. Appl Psychol Health Well‐Being. 2011;3(1):1-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2010.01045.x]
6. Gana K, Broc G, Saada Y, Amieva H, Quintard B. Subjective wellbeing and longevity: Findings from a 22-year cohort study. J Psychosom Res. 2016;85:28-34. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2016.04.004]
7. De Neve JE, Oswald AJ. Estimating the influence of life satisfaction and positive affect on later income using sibling fixed effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2012;109(49):19953-8. [Link] [DOI:10.1073/pnas.1211437109]
8. Walsh LC, Boehm JK, Lyubomirsky S. Does happiness promote career success? Revisiting the evidence. J Career Assess. 2018;26(2):199-219. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/1069072717751441]
9. Quoidbach J, Taquet M, Desseilles M, de Montjoye YA, Gross JJ. Happiness and social behavior. Psychol Sci. 2019;30(8):1111-22. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0956797619849666]
10. Tay L, Diener E. Needs and subjective well-being around the world. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;101(2):354-65. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/a0023779]
11. Bos EH, Snippe E, de Jonge P, Jeronimus BF. Preserving subjective wellbeing in the face of psychopathology: buffering effects of personal strengths and resources. PloS One. 2016;11(3):e0150867. [Link] [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0150867]
12. Diener E. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and a proposal for a national index. Am Psychol. 2000;55(1):34-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.34]
13. Ngamaba KH. Determinants of subjective well-being in representative samples of nations. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27(2):377-82. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/eurpub/ckx081]
14. Diener E, Diener C. The wealth of nations revisited: Income and quality of life. Soc Indic Res. 1995;36(3):275-86. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF01078817]
15. Kwan VS, Bond MH, Singelis TM. Pancultural explanations for life satisfaction: adding relationship harmony to self-esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1997;73(5):1038-51. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/0022-3514.73.5.1038]
16. Uchida Y, Kitayama S, Mesquita B, Reyes JA, Morling B. Is perceived emotional support beneficial? Well-being and health in independent and interdependent cultures. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008;34(6):741-54. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/0146167208315157]
17. Parnami M, Mittal U, Hingar A. Impact of religiosity on subjective well-being in various groups: A comparative study. Ind J Health Wellbeing. 2013;4(4):903-8. [Link]
18. Delle Fave A, Brdar I, Wissing MP, Araujo U, Castro Solano A, Freire T, et al. Lay definitions of happiness across nations: The primacy of inner harmony and relational connectedness. Front Psychol. 2016;7:30. [Link] [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00030]
19. Maulana H, Obst T, Khawaja N. Indonesian perspective of wellbeing: A qualitative study. Qual Rep. 2018;23(12):3136-52. [Link] [DOI:10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3508]
20. Alavi HR. Correlatives of happiness in the university students of Iran (a religious approach). J Religion Health. 2007;46(4):480-99. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10943-007-9115-4]
21. Montazeri A, Omidvari S, Azin A, Aeenparast A, Jahangiri K, Sadighi J, et al. Happiness among Iranians: findings from the Iranian Health Perception Survey (IHPS). Payesh. 2012;11(4):467-75. [Persian] [Link]
22. Mahmoudi A, Mahmoudi F, Shamsaei M, Raeisi Shahraki H, Kakaei H. Determination of the Level of Happiness among Students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2019;7(2). [Link]
23. Pulla V, Carter E. Employing interpretivism in social work research. Int J Soc Work Hum Serv Pract. 2018;6(1):9-14. [Link] [DOI:10.13189/ijrh.2018.060102]
24. Groenewald T. A phenomenological research design illustrated. Int J Qual Method. 2004;3(1):42-55. [Link] [DOI:10.1177/160940690400300104]
25. Speziale HJ, Carpenter DR. Action research method. Qualitative research in nursing: Advancing the humanistic imperative. 4th Edition. Philadelphia: Lippincott, Williams and Wilkins; 2007. [Link]
26. Giorgi A. The theory, practice, and evaluation of the phenomenological method as a qualitative research procedure. J Phenomen Psychol. 1997 J;28(2):235-60. [Link] [DOI:10.1163/156916297X00103]
27. Colaizzi PF. Psychological research as a phenomenologist views it. In: Valle RS, King M, editors. Existential-phenomenological alternatives for psychology. New York; Oxford University Press;1978 [Link]
28. Cohen MZ, Kahn DL, Steeves RH. Hermeneutic phenomenological research: A practical guide for nurse researchers. Sage Publications; 2000. [Link] [DOI:10.4135/9781452232768]
29. Diego-Rosell P, Tortora R, Bird J. International determinants of subjective well-being: Living in a subjectively material world. J Happ Stud. 2018;19(1):123-43. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10902-016-9812-3]
30. Ng W. The duality of wealth: Is material wealth good or bad for well-being? J Soc Res Policy. 2013;4(2):7-19. [Link]
31. Stevenson B, Wolfers J. Subjective well-being and income: Is there any evidence of satiation? Am Econom Rev. 2013;103(3):598-604. [Link] [DOI:10.1257/aer.103.3.598]
32. Delle Fave A, Massimini F, Bassi M. Psychological selection and optimal experience across cultures: Social empowerment through personal growth. Springer Science & Business Media; 2011. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-90-481-9876-4]
33. Eren KA, Aşıcı AA. The determinants of happiness in Turkey: Evidence from city-level data. J Happ Stud. 2017;18(3):647-69. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10902-016-9746-9]
34. Jaafar JL, Idris MA, Ismuni J, Fei Y, Jaafar S, Ahmad Z, et al. The sources of happiness to the Malaysians and Indonesians: data from a smaller nation. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2012;65:549-56. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.164]
35. Asadullah MN, Xiao S, Yeoh E. Subjective well-being in China, 2005-2010: The role of relative income, gender, and location. China Econom Rev. 2018;48:83-101. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.chieco.2015.12.010]
36. Goldstein S, Brooks RB, editors. Resilience in children. 2nd Edition. New York: Springer; 2013. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-1-4614-3661-4]
37. Boehm JK, Lyubomirsky S, Sheldon KM. A longitudinal experimental study comparing the effectiveness of happiness-enhancing strategies in Anglo Americans and Asian Americans. Cogn Emot. 2011;25(7):1263-72. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/02699931.2010.541227]
38. Lucas RE, Dyrenforth PS. Does the existence of social relationships matter for subjective well-being? In Vohs KD, Finkel EJ, editors. Self and relationships: Connecting intrapersonal and interpersonal processes. The Guilford Press; 2006. [Link]
39. Lee YC, Lin YC, Huang CL, Fredrickson BL. The construct and measurement of peace of mind. J Happ Stud. 2013;14(2):571-90. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10902-012-9343-5]
40. Diener E, Oishi S, Lucas RE. National accounts of subjective well-being. Am Psychol. 2015;70(3):234-42. [Link] [DOI:10.1037/a0038899]
41. Busseri MA. Examining the structure of subjective well-being through meta-analysis of the associations among positive affect, negative affect, and life satisfaction. Pers Individ Diff. 2018;122:68-71. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2017.10.003]
42. Agbo AA, Ome B. Happiness: meaning and determinants among young adults of the Igbos of Eastern Nigeria. J Happ Stud. 2017;18(1):151-75. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s10902-016-9722-4]
43. Helliwell J, Layard R, Sachs J. World happiness report 2012 [Internet]. New York: UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network; 2012 [cited 2017 May 12]. Available from: https://worldhappiness.report/ed/2012/. [Link]
44. Uchida Y. A holistic view of happiness: Belief in the negative side of happiness is more prevalent in Japan than in the United States. Psychologia. 2010;53(4):236-45. [Link] [DOI:10.2117/psysoc.2010.236]
45. Wirtz D, Chiu CY, Diener E, Oishi S. What constitutes a good life? Cultural differences in the role of positive and negative affect in subjective well‐being. J Pers. 2009;77(4):1167-96. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2009.00578.x]
46. Noferesti A, Ganji N, Solaymani AA. The main factors affecting happiness in veteran's. Knowl Res Appl Psychol. 2017;17(4):50-8. [Persian] [Link]
47. Ballas D, Dorling D. Measuring the impact of major life events upon happiness. Int J Epidemiol. 2007;36(6):1244-52. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/ije/dym182]
48. Tay L, Li M, Myers D, Diener E. Religiosity and subjective well-being: An international perspective. In Kim-Prieto C editor. Religion and spirituality across cultures. Dordrecht: Springer; 2014. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/978-94-017-8950-9_9]
49. Colon-Baco E. The strength of religious beliefs is important for subjective well-being. Undergrad Econom Rev. 2010;6(1):11. [Link]