Iranian Journal of War and Public Health

eISSN (English): 2980-969X
eISSN (Persian): 2008-2630
pISSN (Persian): 2008-2622
JMERC
0.4
Volume 8, Issue 1 (2016)                   Iran J War Public Health 2016, 8(1): 9-16 | Back to browse issues page

Print XML PDF HTML


History

How to cite this article
Adel Gomnam M, Kamali M, Mobaraki H, Saeedi H. Validity and Reliability Determination of the Persian Version of Prosthesis Evaluation in Individuals with Lower Limb Amputations Questionnaire. Iran J War Public Health 2016; 8 (1) :9-16
URL: http://ijwph.ir/article-1-553-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Rights and permissions
1- Rehabilitation Management Department, Rehabilitation Faculty, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Rehabilitation Management Department, Rehabilitation Faculty, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , kamali@mkamali.com
3- Orthosis & Prosthesis Department, Rehabilitation Faculty, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
* Corresponding Author Address: Rehabilitation Faculty, Madad Karan Street, Shahid Shah Nazari Street, Madar Square, Mirdamad Boulevard, Tehran, Iran
Abstract   (7065 Views)

Aims: Post-amputation rehabilitation can improve the quality of life. Prosthesis evaluation questionnaire (PEQ) has been designed to evaluate the prosthetic functioning and major aspects of the quality of life in persons with lower-limb amputations. The aim of this study was to translate the questionnaire into Persian and evaluate validity and reliability of the translation.

Instrument & Methods: The study was done qualitatively and quantitatively. Firstly, prosthesis evaluation questionnaire was translated into Persian and localized. To evaluate formal validity, the questionnaire was completed by 17 lower-limb amputees referred to Kowsar orthotics and prosthesis center. Its content validity was evaluated by 15 prosthesis experts. Using test-retest method, the questionnaire was completed by 70 amputees referred to the center in 2015. The amputees were selected by simple non-probability method. The questionnaire was completed by 22 of the amputees after 2 weeks, again. Data was analyzed using Cronbach’s alpha, relative repetition coefficient, and impact score.

Findings: The impact score of all the items of the questionnaire was more than 1.5 and favorable. Excluding formal scale and relative repetition coefficient, Cronbach’s alpha was more than the favorable level (0.7) in other scales.

Conclusion: Validity and reliability of the Persian version of prosthesis evaluation questionnaire are favorable; and the version can be used to assess prosthesis and major aspects of the quality of life in the Iranian amputees.

Keywords:

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author